Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

27. Though the accused has denied the correctness of the first address mentioned in the legal notice and complaint, but he has not placed any document to prove as to what exactly is the correct address of the accused. The accused nowhere has denied the correctness of the second address. Though the accused in his evidence in chief has stated his address which is all together different from the two addresses mentioned in the legal notice and complaint but accused has not placed any document to prove that the address mentioned in his evidence in chief is his correct address. Had the accused produced his Aadhar card and other document to prove his address and had the address mentioned in the Aadhar card and other document different from the address mentioned in the legal notice, then there is some reason to believe that the address mentioned in the legal notice is the incorrect address of the accused. At the cost of repetition the notice issued to the accused to the second address is served as per track consignment report. Further in the bail bond executed by the accused before the court he has mentioned the address which is in consonance with the first address mentioned in the legal notice. When the accused has not produced any iota of document to prove that the address mentioned in the legal notice is wrong and incorrect address there is no reason to believe that the complainant has issued legal notice to the incorrect address of the accused.