Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: phone interception in Shaik Akram vs The National Investigation Agency Rep. ... on 20 January, 2017Matching Fragments
Prosecution case:
3. On credible information that accused No.1 and others were circulating Fake Indian Currency notes (for short, FIC notes) of Rs.500/- and Rs.1000/- denominations, the mobile phone numbers of accused No.1 and others were lawfully intercepted under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 after taking necessary permission from the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India and the conversations that took place on the intercepted phones were recorded. From the said intercepted conversations on mobile phones, it was revealed that accused Nos.1, and 2 - who worked at Ramky Infrastructure (ORR Project), Patancheru, Medak district, Andhra Pradesh, and others formed into a group and indulged in smuggling of FIC notes of Rs.500/- and Rs.1000/- denominations from hostile country for circulation of the same in India as a part of larger conspiracy to destabilize the monetary system of India. They were allegedly raising funds for terrorist activities by way of earning genuine currency notes against the FIC notes circulated by them. Vide Order No.11034/36/2011-IS-IV, dated 28-12-2011, the Government of India gave permission for registration of the case and accordingly a case in Cr.No.1/2012/NIA/Hyd was registered against accused Nos.1, 2 and others under Sections 489-B, 489-C read with Section 120-B IPC and Sections 15, 17 and 18 of the UAP Act.