Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: reverse auction in Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs Offshore Infrastructures Limited on 14 October, 2024Matching Fragments
39. It is further submitted that the bill of quantities provided in the contract specified the measurement of work in metric tonnes and included details of piping systems and Equated Inch-Dia calculations. It is further submitted that the Award Holder’s bid covered all possible types of piping within the specified systems.
40. It is submitted that the scope of work was clearly defined under Clause 1.2.0 of the Detailed Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 26.04.2012, which broadly described the work in line with the Tender Specification and Clause 1.9.0 concerning accepted rates. It is further submitted that Clause 1.9.0 specified the rates quoted in reverse auction, emphasizing that the rates were quoted in terms of Rs. per Metric Ton for three systems of piping: Carbon Steel (IBR), Carbon Steel (Non-IBR), and Alloy Steel. The notes to Clause 1.9.0 highlighted that the fabrication work of piping and supports was to be carried out per tender clauses and the work executed would be measured and priced at https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the unit rate accepted by BHEL.