Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

45) in Chintalapalem Village, by the Assistant Settlement Officer on 14.12.1966 vide S.R. No: 369/15(1)/62KHT. To obtain loan from the bank he took the records to the Bank on 20-04-2015 to submit the same to the banker. While he is travelling from Chintalpalem to Yerpedu he lost the same where the bank is located, even the petitioner's best efforts he is not able to trace the missed documents, finally he lodged a report to the P.S. Yerpedu on 22.04.2015 informing the incident. While the investigation is pending by the police, the bank has insisted the writ petitioner to provide duplicate copies for processing the loan, then the petitioner applied through mee-seva on 07.05.2015. As per the certificate dated 07.05.2015, as provided by the mee-seva the petitioner's name was reflected in 1B and Adangal. When the banker insisted to obtain all the documents afresh to process the loan, the Writ Petitioner has again applied through me-seva on 12.06.2015. However, to his shock and dismay, no information was available regarding the survey numbers, and he was told that "Tahsildar verification and approval" were necessary. In the said circumstances, the petitioner left with no other alternative remedy have approached this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the action of the respondents in deleting the name of the petitioner in the relevant revenue records, additionally to direct the respondents to incorporate the name of the writ petitioner in the revenue records with the above prayer.