Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
ITA No.2721/Chny/2017
Rs.3,34,414/- to M/s Wingtec Rotor Service, Germany for repair
services rendered to its customers outside India. The Assessing
officer held that the above services require technical skills and
expertise and hence they are taxable under section 9(1)(vii)
.Further, the AO held that as per the provisions of Double Taxation
Avoidance Agreement with Germany and Srilanka, the Fee for
Technical Services payable to anon-resident is taxable in India at
10%. In this regard, the Ld AR submitted that as per the provisions
of section 9(1)(vii) (b) of the Act, "the income by way of fees for
technical services payable by a person who is a resident, except
where the fees are payable in respect of servicesutilised in a
business or profession carried on by such person outside India or
for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source
outside India " shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India. Since
the above mentioned services are provided at the customer
premises outsideIndia, they relate to business of the assessee
outside India. Hence, these payments under the category of FTS
is not taxable in India.In this regard, reliance was placed on the
decision of CIT V. Faizan Shoes (P.) Ltd [2014] 48 taxmann.com
48 (Madras). It was also pleaded that ever assuming that these
payments are related to the business income of the foreign
:-4-:
The appellant's contention that the nature of payment made to
WFPL, Srilanka is not in the nature of Fees for technical
Service' as per the explanation (2] to Section 9(i)(vii) of the
Income, tax Act.
Thus the appellant claims that as the Income is not in the
nature of FTS. it must be treated as business Income in the
hands of WFPL,, Srilanka. As per Article 7 of India-Srilanka
DTAA, Business profits of an enterprise of Srilanka must be
taxable only in Srilanka unless the enterprise carries on
business in India through Permanent Establishment. However
Explanation [2] of Section 9(i)(vii) states that-For the purposes
of this clause, '"fees for technical services" means any
consideration (including any lump sum consideration or
rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services
(including the provision of services of technical or other
personnel) but does not include consideration for any
construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the
recipient or consideration which would be income of recipient
chargeable under the head '"Salaries".]
The appellant's contention that the project undertaken in
Srilanka is mere construction and hence does not qualify as Fee
for Technical Service. In the Work Order issued by Regen
PowertechPvt. Ltd. to M/s Windforcepvt. ltd., the scope of the
work is mentioned as '"WFPL to operate the crane under
supervision and control of REGEN. The work assigned is
mentioned as "Loading and Unloading of our WEC components
at REGEN, WEC locations, De-Erection and Erection of
foundation cans, steel towers, Nacelle, Generator, Rotor,
Blades and other supporting components of WEC at REGEN
sites. Dismantling, assembly, loading and unloading of crane
and crane parts at REGEN site." In the conditions of contract,
Clause 3.0 states that
Windforce Pvt Ltd shall give or provide all necessary
superintendence during the .execution of the Works and as long
thereafter as the Site Engineer may consider necessary for the
:-7-:
ITA No.2721/Chny/2017
commercial, or scientific equipment, as the present payment is
towards hiring of cranes and hence in the nature of right to use
Industrial, Therefore I upheld the action of the AO to treat the
payment Rs.l,19,47,013/- paid to M/s Windforce Private.
Limited, Srilanka for erection and commission services rendered
to customers outside India as FTS or Royalty liable to 10% TDS
and as appellant has failed to do so, hence appellant is in
default in view of sec 201(1) of the Act and therefore the AO has
rightly levied tax and interest u/s 20 1(1) & u/s 201(1A) of the
Act. The ground of appeal is therefore dismissed.
As regard the REPAIR SERVICE, the appellant has engaged
M/s. Wingtec rotor service, Germany for carrying out repair on
the rotor blades by deploying its service technicians and had
incurred an amount of Rs.3,34,414 towards the same and
appellant has not deducted IDS on the said payment for the
reason that the nature of remittance is towards repair charges,
the repairs are most typical features like cracking and
roughness on the surface of the blades, electric short circuit in
the generator arid overheating of the gearbox all demand a
sophisticated approach to maintenance. Hence these repairs
are not mundane repairs, but require highly sophisticated
techniques and hence in the nature of Technical Services as per
section 9(l)(vii) r.w. Explanation 2 of IT Act 1961.
As the payments for repair service were made to Non Resident
of Germany during the F.Y. 2013-14, the taxability as per DTHA
with Germany. Article 12 Royalties and fees for technical
services arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of
the other Contracting State may be taxed in the other State.
However, such royalties and fees for technical services may
also be taxed in the contracting State in which they arise and
according to the laws of that state, but if the recipient is the
beneficial owner of the royalties, or fees for technical services,
the tax so charged shall or exceed 10 per cent of the gross
amount of the royalties or fees for technical services.
The terms "fees for technical services" as under in this Article
means payments of arty amount, in consideration for the
services of a managerial, technical or consultancy nature,
including the provisions of services of technical or other
personnel.
Hence an amount of Rs.3,34,414/- paid to M/s. Wingtec Rotor
Service, being in the nature of FTS is rightly treated as income
chargeable to tax in India and hence liable to TDS. In view of
the above discussion I upheld the action of the AO to treat the
payment Rs. 3,34,414/- paid to M/s Wingtec Rotor Service,
Srilanka for repair services rendered to customers outside India
as FTS liable to 10% TDS and as appellant has failed to do so,
:-9-:
ITA No.2721/Chny/2017