Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: college code in Sone Lal Burman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 October, 2019Matching Fragments
2 3 The college code shall apply to all Colleges admitted to the privileges of the University excepting the colleges 'maintained or manage by the State Government or a Municipal Corporation or the University.
3 12(1)(f) Two representatives of the University other than members of the Foundation Society of the college nominated by the Executive Council at least one of whom shall be from amongst the teachers of the University as far as possible working in institutions not located in the same town as the college.
4. On the basis of Statute 30, petitioner submits that the order dated 21.08.2014 and 02.12.2016 are illegal, vitiated and arbitrary and deserve to be set aside. Petitioner submits that he is a permanent employee and he be terminated from service by passing order that he is no longer required and by paying salary in lieu of notice of one month. As per College Code, departmental enquiry is to be conducted on the grounds mentioned in the Code. Petitioner further submitted that the appellate Tribunal also did not consider the grounds, which were raised by him and first appeal was dismissed only on the ground that Statute 30 is not applicable in case of the petitioner. The order passed by the Registrar also deserves to be set aside.
13. Petitioner was given appointment order and later on, he was confirmed after successful completion of probation. He was getting salary as per AICTE norms. Petitioner made repeated requests for producing the record, but the record prayed for by the petitioner was not produced by the respondents. From the material available on record, it is clear that petitioner was regularly appointed by the society and College Code and Statute 30 are applicable in the case of the petitioner, therefore, his services could not have been terminated without following the procedure laid down in Statute 30.