Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
Petitioner somehow developed contact with respondent No.1 and
narrated the said incident to him. She told him how she was thrown out
by his parents from the shared household.
The respondent No.1 who was/is bound to protect her interests didn't
come to her rescue, he rather told her to manage something by her own
which was very harsh/unbecoming on her part.
Despite all this, the petitioner kept on calling the respondent No.1 and
thought good sense may prevail upon him and they would again start
living together but all in vain.
It is relevant to mention herein that even after getting mercilessly
beaten up the respondents on 24th December, 2015, the petitioner
remained mum and didn't report the incidents of domestic before any
forum. She did it to protect her relation with respondent No.1 as the didn't
want to lose him.
Whereas, the respondent No.1 didn't care for her, even after being in
courtship with her for eight years, he did not stand by her when she was
thrown out by his parents from shared house hold. Perhaps he married the
petitioner to play with her emotions. As has been mentioned above that it
was after very fifteen days of their marriage, he left her and withdrew
from her company. He has virtually exploited the petitioner and ruined
her life.