Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
6 PW2 has deposed that she was playing pehli duggo with her seven friends namely Salony, Divya, Varsha , Pooja and her sister was also playing with them. They were playing outside the mithai shop . Both the accused persons caught hold of her and took her near the stairs. Then both the accused persons removed her clothes. Then she pointed towards accused Vijay and deposed that he removed all his clothes and her clothes and made her nude and lyed down near the stairs on the floor and made the victim lie on the floor as well. Then she pointed towards the accused Mukesh and said she was not willing to take his penis into her mouth , but he forcibly put his penis in her mouth . He also gave toffee to her. Accused Vijay made her sit on his lap and both the accused put scratch marks on her face and arms. Accused Mukesh put his penis twice into her mouth, once in the narrow gali and once in stairs. After doing all this, accused Vijay apologized by saying "mujhe maaf kar de"
said that he forcibly put his penis into her mouth and also gave toffee to her. Then she pointed towards accused Vijay and deposed that he removed all his clothes and made her nude and he lyed down near the stairs on the floor and made her lye on the floor as well and put his penis twice in her mouth. In her cross examination by Ld. Defence counsel , PW2 categorically stated after pointing towards accused Vijay that he is staying in the gali behind from where they go to school and accused Mukesh is residing at Minto Road where she used to go for filling water with her sister. She further admitted that she reached her house on the date of incident at about 11 pm and when she reached the house she told everything to her mother and police was already present at her house. She further admitted that she had told her mother that the accused persons had removed her clothes as while leaving her , the accused persons "ne mujhe ulti salwar pehna di". The said fact that when the victim reached the house, police was already present and she narrated the entire facts to her mother is corroborated with complaint Ex.PW1/A. In the instant case, PW2 who is the child witness herself is the victim of crime and is the best person to narrate the incident . She while deposing in the court clearly identified both the accused persons and after categorically pointing towards them deposed the exact act which was done by each of the accused person. Accused Mukesh in his disclosure statement Ex.PW7/C admitted that he along with accused Vijay had misbehaved with the victim in the night while she was playing with other kids of the locality. There is no cross examination on the point that the statement was not made voluntarily or that the accused was forced to FIR No. 130/08 11/15 12.03.12.