Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

The petitioner contends that he is working as a machine operator in the Matsyafed factory at Ernakulam from 20.10.2005 onwards on a provisional basis. He contends that he is eligible for permanent appointment which has been denied to him by the 2nd respondent. He points out that persons who are similarly placed as the petitioner were made permanent by the 2 nd respondent and the petitioner was discriminated against. Stating all these aspects and seeking indulgence, Ext.P10 representation was submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. His prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 1 st respondent to consider Ext.P10 on its merits and pass appropriate orders.