Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: privileged will in Sunita Shivdasani vs Geeta Gidwani And Anr. on 8 February, 2007Matching Fragments
3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged in actual warfare or mariner being at sea. Privileged Will are oral but requirements of Section 66 of the Act must be complied with including presence of two witnesses at the time when the oral Will is made and a Will made by word of mouth is null at the expiry of one month, if the testator is alive. Ld. Single Judge has held that late Mr. K.D. Shivadasani could not have made a privileged will.
13. Section 65 of the Act relates to execution of privileged Wills or oral Wills. Section 65 has not been included in Schedule III and in view of Sections 57 of the Act, the same is therefore not applicable to Hindus. It, therefore, follows that Hindus cannot make a privileged Will after 1st January, 1927 even if conditions of Section 65 are satisfied. Section 66 of the Act will obviously have no application to Hindus as the said Section relates to mode of execution of an oral or a privileged Will and other conditions for a valid oral will.