Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

This being so, the provisions of the State Act which impinge upon the provisions of the Central Act are void and, therefore, unenforceable. It is for these reasons that the appointment of the High Power Committee by the State Government to inspect the respondent-Trust was void as has been rightly held by the High Court."

33. The Supreme Court then proceeded to examine the provisions of Madras University Act. It observed that a comparison of the Central Act and the Madras University Act shows that as far as institutions imparting technical education are concerned, there is a conflict between and overlapping of the functions of the Council and the University. After enumerating the various matters on which the Central Act and the University Act were found overlapping, the Supreme Court observed: