Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

In the instant suit, the plaintiff has alleged that subsequent to ejectment order dated 14.10.2005 (Annexure P-1), defendants agreed to sell the disputed shop to the plaintiff vide agreement dated 07.02.2006. However, in spite thereof, the defendants filed execution petition for executing ejectment order (Annexure P-1). The plaintiff sought temporary injunction restraining the defendants from doing so during pendency of the suit, which has been instituted for declaration and specific performance of the aforesaid agreement dated 07.02.2006.

For the reasons aforesaid, I find no ground to grant temporary injunction to the plaintiff against execution of ejectment order passed by the Rent Controller. Plaintiff has failed to make out necessary ingredients for grant of temporary injunction. Courts below have rightly declined the same to the plaintiff. Impugned orders of the courts below do not suffer from perversity, illegality or jurisdictional error so as to call for interference by this Court in exercise of supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.