Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

36. It was vehemently argued that the action of respondents being in violation of basic principle of natural justice is liable to be quashed and set aside. Reliance has been placed by learned counsel for applicants on SHAMSHER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS, 1974 (2) SLR, 701 SC. M.P. STATE COOP. BANK LTD. VS. NANU RAM YADAV & OTHERS, 2007 (4) SCT 764 SC. HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEV. BANK VS. SUNIL DUTTA & OTHERS, 2002(7) SLR 257 (P&H), INDRA PAL GUPTA VS. M.C.MODEL INTER COLLEGE & OTHERS, 1984 (2) SLR, 422 SC. KUMAOU MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD,. VS. GIRJA SHANKAR, 2001(1) SCT 607 SC. K.I. SHEPHARD VS. UOI ETC. 1987 SCC (L&S) 438. M/S NAGARJUNA CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. VS. GOVT. OF A.P. 2008(12) JT 371 SC. STATE OF ORISSA VS. DR. BINAPANI DEI & OTHERS, 1967 AIR SC 1269. HINDU COLLEGE, SONEPAT VS. SADHU RAM SAINI, 1992(2) SCT 603, P&H). SANJAY SINGH & ANOTHER VS. UP PSC, JT 2007 (2) 534 SC. D.K. YADAV VS. J.M.A. INDUSTRIES LTD, as over ruled (OA.NO. 060/00684/2018 etc. DR. SARABJIT SINGH ETC. VS. UOI ETC.) in STATE OF U.P. VS. ABHAI KISHORE MASTA, 1993 (4) SLR 126 SC and JAGDISH MITTER VS. UOI AIR 1964 SC