Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
"109. The judgments hereinabove reveal the divergent views of
different High Courts on the date from which maintenance must
be awarded. Even though a judicial discretion is conferred upon
the court to grant maintenance either from the date of
application or from the date of the order in Section 125(2) CrPC,
it would be appropriate to grant maintenance from the date of
application in all cases, including Section 125 CrPC. In the
practical working of the provisions relating to maintenance, we
find that there is significant delay in disposal of the applications
for interim maintenance for years on end. It would therefore be
in the interests of justice and fair play that maintenance is
awarded from the date of the application.
111. The rationale of granting maintenance from the date of
application finds its roots in the object of enacting maintenance
legislations, so as to enable the wife to overcome the financial
crunch which occurs on separation from the husband. Financial
constraints of a dependant spouse hamper their capacity to be
effectively represented before the court. In order to prevent a
dependant from being reduced to destitution, it is necessary that
maintenance is awarded from the date on which the application
for maintenance is filed before the court concerned.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000642
order or the date of the application in matters of maintenance.
Thus, as per Section 354(6) of the Cr.P.C., the Court should
record reasons in support of the order passed by it, in both
eventualities. The purpose of the provision is to prevent vagrancy
and destitution in society and the court must apply its mind to the
options having regard to the facts of the particular case.
6. In Shail Kumari Devi v. Krishan Bhagwan Pathak this Court
dealt with the question as to from which date a Magistrate may
order payment of maintenance to wife, children or parents. In
Shail Kumari Devi this Court considered a catena of decisions by
the various High Courts, before arriving at the conclusion that it
was incorrect to hold that, as a normal rule, the Magistrate
should grant maintenance only from the date of the order and not
from the date of the application for maintenance. It is, therefore,
open to the Magistrate to award maintenance from the date of
application. The Court held, and we agree, that if the Magistrate
intends to pass such an order, he is required to record reasons in
support of such order. Thus, such maintenance can be awarded
from the date of the order, or, if so ordered, from the date of the
application for maintenance, as the case may be. For awarding
maintenance from the date of the application, express order is
necessary.
7. In the case before us, the High Court has not given any reason
for not granting maintenance from the date of the application.
We are of the view that the circumstances eminently justified
grant of maintenance with effect from the date of the application
in view of the finding that the appellant had worked before
marriage and had not done so during her marriage. There was
no evidence of her income during the period the parties lived as
man and wife. We, therefore reverse the order of the High Court
in this regard and direct that the respondent shall pay the
amount of maintenance found payable from the date of the
application for maintenance. As far as maintenance granted
under Section 24 of the H.M. Act by the Courts below is
concerned, it shall remain unaltered. Accordingly, the appeal is
allowed."