Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Attingal Municipal Town Service ... vs The Kerala Co-Operative Ombudsman on 29 January, 2019

Author: V.Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

                                  &

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.NARAYANA PISHARADI

      TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019/9TH MAGHA, 1940

                         W.A.No. 312 of 2018

 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24-11-2017 IN WP(C).NO.13274/2015 OF
                           THIS COURT

APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

             ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
             BANK LTD. NO. T.437, KUZHIYILMUKKU, ATTINGAL,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.K.SIJU
             SMT.RENY ANTO
             SRI.S.ABHILASH

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

      1      THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE OMBUDSMAN,
             FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023, REPRESENTED
             BY ITS SECRETARY.

      2      THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT AND
             WELFARE FUND BOARD,
             GANDHARI AMMAN KOVIL ROAD,
             THIRUVANANTHAPUARM - 695 001,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

      3      REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      4      CHANDRAN PILLAI N., PARANKIMAMVILA VEEDU,
             THACHOORKUNNU, AVANAVANCHERRY P.O., ATTINGAL,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 101.

             BY   ADVS.
             R2   BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KCDWFB
             R4   BY ADV.SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI
             R1   & R3 BY SMT.K.R.DEEPA,SR.GOVT.PLEADER(B/O)

THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.01.2019, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WA312/2018
                                    2




                                 JUDGMENT

Chitambaresh, J.

1. The impugned judgment inter alia states as follows:

"Both the writ petitions are materially connected, relating to the benefit sought for by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.22053 of 2017 before the Kerala Co- operative Ombudsman [for short, 'the Ombudsman'] under the Risk Fund Scheme. The Ombudsman has passed an order directing the Bank to grant maximum benefit to the petitioner therein under the Risk Fund Scheme. Therefore, I heard them together and propose to deliver a common judgment.
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Perused the pleadings and the documents on record in both the writ petitions. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.22053 of 2017, learned Senior Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the Kerala Co-operative Development and Welfare Fund Board."

2. It could thus be seen that WP(C).Nos.13274/2015 and 22053/2017 were heard and disposed of together by the common judgment impugned. The issues therein are intertwined and the appellant herein was a party to both the WA312/2018 3 writ petitions. But the writ appeal has been filed only against WP(C).No.13274/2015 and no writ appeal has been filed against WP(C).No.22053/2017. The final judgment in WP(C).No.22053/2017 hence operates as res judicata for the present writ appeal filed against WP(C).No.13274/2015. The writ appeal fails. Dismissed.

V. CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JUDGE Sha/300119