Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: revocable trust in Mahuva Kapol Vidhyarthi Gruh Balashram ... vs Umeshkumar Kantilal Sheth & ... on 28 March, 2016Matching Fragments
On perusal of the relevant part of the plaint, it appears that the plaintiffs have alleged misrepresentation, collusion etc., in obtaining sanction of the Charity Commissioner.
Prima facie, this can be considered as a dispute raised by the plaintiffs which is of civil nature. Learned senior advocate Shri Joshi has drawn attention to Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act which is applicable to Maharashtra State. It is pertinent to note that Section 36 (2) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act takes care of the revocation of sanction once granted, even in case when sanction is obtained by committing 'fraud' or by misrepresentation made to him or by concealing from the Charity Commissioner the facts material for the purpose of granting sanction. It was also submitted that in substance the prayer to challenge the sale deed in the nature of consequential nature and it depends upon the prayer of setting aside grant of sanction by the Charity Commissioner.