Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: para wise reply in Chaman Lal Goyal vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 1 March, 2016Matching Fragments
34. The replication filed to the short reply filed by the Chairman of the Public Service Commission (respondent No.4), again alleges that no para-wise reply having been filed to the contents of the writ petition, proves the fact that the Commission did not examine the merits of the case at the time when its advice was sought by the Government.
Factually, it is seen that the reply of the Commission is specifically in answer to paragraphs 23 and 28 (i & j) of the writ petition, because of the specific allegations against the actions/acts of omission, of the Commission, made by the petitioner, in those paragraphs of the writ petition. After making preliminary submissions in the replication, the contents of paragraphs 23 and 28 (i & j) of the written statement have also been controverted by the petitioner.