Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: API based PBAS in Sikkim University And Anr vs Vaidyanathan Krishna Ananth And Anr on 24 March, 2020Matching Fragments
7. Clause 6.4.8 of UGC Regulations, 2010 reads as follows:
6.4.8. Associate Professor completing three years of service in stage 4 and possessing a Ph.D. Degree in the relevant discipline shall be eligible to be appointed and designated as Professor and be placed in the next higher grade (stage 5), subject to (a) satisfying the required credit points as per API based PBAS methodology provided in Table I-III of Appendix IV stipulated in these Regulations, and (b) an assessment by a duly constituted selection committee as suggested for the direct recruitment of Professor.
Provided that no teachers other than those with a Ph.D. shall be promoted or appointed as Professor.
8. Clause 6.0.2 of the UGC Regulations, 2010 was amended and substituted by the 2nd amendment with the following clause:
6.0.2. The Universities shall adopt these Regulations for selection committees and selection procedures through their respective statutory bodies incorporating the Academic Performance Indicator (API) based Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS) at the institutional level for University Departments and their Constituent colleges/ affiliated colleges (Government/ Government aided/ Autonomous/Private colleges) to be followed transparently in all the selection processes. An indicative PBAS template proforma for direct (Sikkim University & Anr. Vs. Dr. Vaidyanathan Krishnan Ananth & Anr.) recruitment and for Career Advancement Schemes (CAS) based on API based PBAS is annexed in Appendix III. The Universities may adopt the template proforma or may devise their own self-assessment cum performance appraisal forms for teachers. While adopting this, universities shall not change any of the categories or scores of the API given in Appendix-III.