Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Traffic apprentice in R. Premakumari vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 14 May, 2008Matching Fragments
(Emphasis added) 12.5 In (2001) 2 SCC 186 = (2001) 1 Supreme 169 (E.S.P. RAJARAM AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS), while negativing the claim regarding entitlement of higher emoluments, the Supreme Court observed:-
"23. ...However, in our considered view, it will be just and fair to clarify that any amount drawn by such employees either in the basic post (Traffic Apprentice) or in a promotional post will not be required to be refunded by the employee concerned as a consequence of this judgment. This position also follows as a necessary corollary from the observations made by this Court in para 18 of the judgment in M. Bhaskar case."