Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parle products in Izuk Chemical Works vs Babu Ram Dharam Prakash on 11 May, 2007Matching Fragments
20. To the same effect was the pronouncement rendered by the learned single Judge in AIR 1987 Delhi 312 Vrajlal Manilal and Co. v. N.S. Bidi Co. and Anr. In this behalf, I may also usefully advert to the provisions of Section 2(1)(J) wherein the word 'Mark' has been defined to include numeral or any combination thereof.
21. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on the judicial pronouncement in 1997 PTC 17 134 William Grant and Sons Ltd. v. Mc. Dowell and Co. Ltd.; Parle Products P. Ltd. v. J.P. and Co., Mysore in support of the submission that the label of the defendant had incorporated all essential features of the plaintiff's label deliberately and dishonestly with the intention of bringing similarity between the products of the plaintiff and defendant so as to confuse the purchasers and the consumers.