Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: noida authority in Cbi vs Ajay Kumar Rai on 20 December, 2024Matching Fragments
- The valuation of the property i.e. cost of the property was done through the office of District Valuation Officer, Income Tax Department, Meerut and was taken as = Rs.1,40,300/-.
(c) Property bearing No. E-16, Sector-20, Noida, District Uttar Pradesh :
- That on 14.08.1980 this property was allotted through lottery system to one Sh. Jagdish Kumar Mehra r/o F-41, Phase-I, Ashok Vihar Delhi by Noida Authority for a sum of Rs. 46,200/- and considering the request letter dated 17.04.21983 of allottee, this property was treated as Joint property in the name of allottee and Smt. Vandana Mehra and a Sale Deed was executed in their favour by the Noida Authority on 28.04.1983.
- Witness further deposed that they have inherited six bighas of Agricultural Land in the village ; the agricultural produce of the said land are equally distributed between the four brothers and about Rs. 30,000/- is their annual income.
- In the cross-examination, witness stated that in the year 2000 a sum of Rs. 15,000/- approximately was the annual income of each brother.
77. PW-21 Sh. S.M. Bhatia deposed that he joined Noida Authority as an Assistant in the year 1977 ; he went to the office of CBI on the directions of his Senior Officer Sh. R.S. Yadav, OSD and handed over record of two files bearing no. (i) F-64- C-16, Flat no. 376 Sector-40, Noida, UP and (ii) E-16 Sector 20 Noida, UP through his assistant Sh Sandeep via letter dated 26.11.2023, and identified his signatures on the same at point 'A' on Ex PW21/1(D-41).
296. PW-21 Sh. S.M. Bhatia from the Noida Authority was examined by the prosecution in support of its case. But the witness is merely proving the document whereby the property was transferred in the name of Ms. Manjula Rai, and nothing more than that.
297. No positive evidence has been led by the prosecution to support their case that the consideration amount and the cost of the additional room so constructed there was made for and on behalf of accused A.K. Rai or by him.
298. Similarly, is the case of other property at Noida i.e. Property bearing No. E-16, Sector-20, Noida, District Uttar Pradesh, where by PW-21 Sh. S.M. Bhatia had produced the record of Flat no. E-16/20, Ex PW21/3 (Colly.) which was initially allotted to Sh. J.K. Mehra son of Sh. R.R. Mehra on 14.01.1980 for a consideration of Rs. 46,200/-, which lateron was transferred by the allottee to Ms. Manjula Rai on 23.11.1996 with the consent of Noida Authority.
321. He also admitted that he did not see the local schedule of rates notified by Noida Authority / Greater Noida Authority at the time of carrying out its Valuation, where the properties were situated.
322. Thus, analyzing the testimony of this witness, the valuation report Ex PW25/1 (colly.) and the abstracts submitted thereto are found lacking on vital aspects and the Valuation report raises strong doubt over its correctness and authenticity.
323. (iv) - Property at Allahabad U.P - bearing No. C-303/1, IInd Floor Gulteria Apartment, Civil Lines, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh-299.