Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unexecutable decree in R.J.Paul vs S.N.Kulasekaran on 9 February, 2010Matching Fragments
17. In C.R.P.1360 of 1999 filed by the third respondent against the first respondent/plaintiff, this Court, on 10.8.1999, while dismissing the revision petition has directed the Executing Court to see that the decree holder obtains physical possession of the property within a period of one month from today and report compliance of the same to this Court and also directed the trial Court to provide an adequate and necessary police protection to see that the property is delivered to the decree holder and no obstruction is caused in executing the decree and further observation that the question of identification of property in execution also does not arise since that was the matter in the suit itself, and the decree has been passed allowing the recovery of the property in the possession of the defendants and that the defendants cannot dispute the identity of the property, which is in his possession and the Executing Court has been directed to see that the warrant of delivery is also not returned on frivolous grounds, making the decree unexecutable and the Executing Court has been directed to comply with the aforesaid directions in all its seriousness etc.,