Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: computer forensics in D.Sathish vs . on 27 November, 2025Matching Fragments
3.16.P.W.24, the Assistant Director in Forensic Sciences Department, Anthropology section has examined M.O.9 pendrive, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 05:25:20 pm ) R.T.No.1 of 2025 and Crl.A.No.1744 of 2025 Ex.P.46 photographs of the accused and Ex.P.47, photograph of the wall with name Sathya and has issued Ex.P.48 Anthropological report. She has opined that the photographs of the accused and the images of a male individual in the pendrive were compared and they were tallying with the photographs of the accused. P.W.25, Assistant Director of the Forensic Sciences Department in Computer Forensic Section has examined two mobile phones used by the accused and the deceased and also examined the whatsapp messages and has issued Computer Forensic Examination report Ex.P.50. P.W.26, Special Sub Inspector has deposed that he has accompanied the dead body and handed over the same to the hospital. P.W.27 is the police photographer and he took photographs of the accused and also took photograph of the wall in the residence of the accused where the name of the deceased was written. He developed the photographs and downloaded the same in the CD and handed over the same to the Inspector. The production cum receipt memo was marked as Ex.P.51. He has also issued a certificate under section 65B of the Indian https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 05:25:20 pm ) R.T.No.1 of 2025 and Crl.A.No.1744 of 2025 Evidence Act which was marked as Ex.P.52.