Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: AMASR in M/S Jagdish Chander Vij (Huf) vs M/S Rawal Apartments Pvt. Ltd on 21 December, 2022Matching Fragments
3.14 It was pleaded that ASI as well as defendant preferred their respective appeals before the Hon'ble Supreme court of India challenging order dated 23.07.2004, however, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide its judgment dated 16.01.2012 upheld AMASR Act 2012 and rejected the appeal of the defendant.
3.15 It was pleaded that during the pendency of the appeals before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the AMASR Act 1958 was amended in 2010 and Section 20A and 20B were inserted w.e.f. 16.06.1992 and section 20C to 20Q were inserted w.e.f. 29.03.2010. It was further pleaded that in view of the CS No. 56441/16 M/s Jagdish Chander Vij (HUF) Vs. M/s Rawal Apartments Pvt. Ltd. 18/86 amended provisions of AMASR Act 1958, defendant applied to competent authority seeking permission for repair/renovation (completion of the flooring, plaster inside and outside, electric, sanitary fittings and lifts (as per plan) of existing building at the property and submitted requisite form-I. 3.16 It was pleaded that competent authority on 18.05.2012 considering the facts and circumstances of the case of defendant to be falling within the ambit of section 20D (7) of AMASR Act and Rules framed there under, recommended finishing of the building over the property but without any extension vertically or horizontally.