Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

- 59 -

NC: 2025:KHC:18276 conducted by the learned counsel Sri N.U.Narasimhan. He also represented defendant No.2 before the High Court in HRRP proceedings and got an eviction order. DW.2 states that through learned counsel Sri N.U.Narasimhan she paid certain amounts to the tenants and all the documents were kept by him. Therefore, she allege that he obtained the signature of her mother defendant No.1 without her knowledge. This testimony of DW.2 appears to be an afterthought. The reason being that the parties had agreed that the tenants have to be evicted before execution of the Sale Deed. The eviction proceedings were filed by defendant No.2 and it was keenly observed and followed by the plaintiff. It appears that all the instructions to conduct eviction proceedings was given by the plaintiff. The circumstances of the family of the defendants as may be found in the affidavit evidence of DW.2 would show that her father Sri S.M.Ramesh had obtained the suit schedule property in a partition, with three tenants in the property. He was suffering from heart ailment and had suffered paralysis and as such, he could not fight the litigation. He has appointed defendant No.1 as his