Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: e-mail contracts in Rao Mohd. Nadeem vs Wapcos Limited on 10 September, 2020Matching Fragments
5. Name of the Department of WAPCOS Ltd. which bid for the aforesaid Projects.
6. Role, Duties and Responsibilities of Ms. Pooja Kapoor, Mr. Akhil Gaur and Mr. Jatin Mittal of Business Development and Road Department during Bidding and Execution of the aforesaid Projects.
7. Copies of letters including e-mails exchanged whereby the aforesaid contracts were awarded in favour of M/s WAPCOS Ltd. in State of Chhattisgarh.
8. Please confirm whether the bids as well as the contracts awarded to M/s WAPCOS Ltd. in the State of Chhattisgarh were in conformity to RFP of the Project, as issued from time to time. In case there is any deviation to RFP, the same may be specifically explained.
9. Please Confirm that Data Uploaded on the Infracon Portal was Correct at the time of locking the bid and Name of the Person responsible for approving and feeding the data on Infracon Portal along with Designation and date of locking bids.
10.Please provide the copies of LOIs, Contract Agreements and correspondence including e mails exchanged in relation to each project awarded to M/s WAPCOS Ltd with respect to Projects being executed in the State of Chhattisgarh.
11.Name of the Key Person along with designations who gave consent for the bids on infracon. How were key Persons arranged and arrangement with Key Persons? Provide the copy of Memorandum of Understanding / Agreement with Key Persons.
"information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, report, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force."
Furthermore, a reference can also be made to the relevant extract of Section 2 (j) of the RTI Act, 2005 which reads as under:-
Similarly, the High Court of Bombay in Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-Officio Joint Secretary (School Education) v. The Goa State Information Commission on 3 April, 2008 (2008 (110) Bom L R 1238) had held as under:-
"Section 2(f) -Information means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force; The definition cannot include within its fold answers to the question why which would be the same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of a justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justifications are matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information."