Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

16. PW 24 is the police officer, who recorded Ext.P1 FIS and registered Ext.P1(a) FIR. He also saw the CCTV visuals along with the investigating officer and understood the details of the accused. Thereafter, he brought the accused to the police station. In his cross examination he stated that 7.35 am which is recorded in the FIR, is the time when the information received was recorded and completed.

17. PW25, the Assistant Director of Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Cochin, deposed that on 18/12/2009 she examined the hard disk marked as Q1 and recovered the video footage for the period 1.08 am to 1.20 am on 27/11/2019 . She stated that she 2025:KER:24851 copied it into Annexure -1 DVD. She also prepared and handed over Ext.P24 report at that time. The DVD was identified and marked as Ext.P25. She stated that on examining the video footage, she could identify the man shown in the standard photograph assaulting and sexually abusing a woman. She identified the said person as the accused in the dock. She also identified MO1 as the weapon used by him and MO4 series as the DVR and charger examined by her. In her cross examination, she stated that Ext.P24 does not contain the hash value and that Folder No.1 of Ext.P25 contains the original visuals as retrieved from Q1.