Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

8.   The Forum after hearing both the sides and perusing the documents on record, partly allowed the complaint as aforesaid. The Forum has held that the opposite party depositing an amount of Rs. 2,92,000/- directly into the account of the complainant reflects that it can be only with the intention to avoid executing the sale deed in favour of the complainants as rightly alleged by the complainants. The Forum has further held that the opposite party No. 2 is a developer and he must be maintaining record of every transaction. Had the opposite party No. 2 refunded the amount of Rs. 2,92,000/- as per the request made by the complainant, it would have handed over the cheque to the complainants personally and would have also taken the receipt to that effect. The Forum has further held that admittedly there was an agreement of sale executed between both the parties and the complainant had availed loan from a particular bank. The opposite party insisting to avail the loan from the particular bank only and not supplying the necessary documents for procuring the said loan results into deficiency in service and therefore the opposite parties are liable to supply the necessary documents and execute the sale deed in favour of the complainants after receiving the balance amount of consideration from the complainants.