Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: semen in Mukesh Kumar vs State Of H.P on 27 December, 2022Matching Fragments
victim had given the history of penetration. This witness had preserved the samples of endovaginal swab, endocervical swab, nail clippings, slide from vagina, anal swab, clothes, pubic hair and slide from endocervix and sealed the same and handed over to the police. After receipt of the receipt of FSL report Ext. P-X on 23.04.2015, this witness had deposed that human semen was detected on the shirt, salwar and vaginal swab of the victim. On the basis of above facts, she has given that the possibility of sexual intercourse, in this case, cannot be ruled-out. She has proved the MLC Ext.PW-15/B. She has duly identified the wearing apparels of the child victim as well as the samples, in which, she had put the physical evidence collected by her during the medico legal examination of the child victim.
"18. Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is a molecule that encodes the genetic information in all living organisms. DNA genotype can be obtained from any biological material such as bone, blood, semen, saliva, hair, skin, etc. Now, for several years, DNA profile has also shown a tremendous impact on forensic investigation. Generally, when DNA profile of a sample found at the scene of crime matches with DNA profile of the suspect, it can generally be concluded that both samples have the same biological origin. DNA profile is valid and reliable, but variance in a particular result depends on the quality control and quality procedure in the laboratory. (self emphasis supplied)
"Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, consists of long ribbon-like molecules, the chromosomes, 46 of which lie tightly coiled in nearly every cell of the body. These chromosomes - 23 provided from the mother and 23 from the father at conception, form the genetic blueprint of the body. Different sections of DNA have different identifiable and discrete characteristics. When a criminal leaves a stain of blood or semen at the scene of the crime it may prove possible to extract from that crime stain sufficient sections of DNA to enable a comparison to be made with the same sections extracted from a sample of blood provided by the suspect. This process is complex and we could not hope to describe it more clearly or succintly than did Lord Taylor C.J. in the case of Deen (transcript: December 21, 1993), so we shall gratefully adopt his description.
226. In Rajkumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh[95], the Court was dealing with a case of rape and murder of a 14 year old girl.
.
The DNA report established the presence of semen of the appellant in the vaginal swab of the prosecutrix. The conviction was recorded relying on the DNA report. In the said context, the following was stated:
"8. The deceased was 14 years of age and a student in VIth standard which was proved from the school register and the statement of her father Iknis Jojo (PW1). Her age has also been mentioned in the FIR as 14 years. So far as medical evidence is concerned, it was mentioned that the deceased prosecutrix was about 16 years of age. So far as the analysis report of the material sent and the DNA report is concerned, it revealed that semen of the appellant was found on the vaginal swab of the deceased. The clothes of the deceased were also found having appellant's semen spots. The hair which were found near the place of occurrence were found to be that of the appellant."