Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

               Reply          has      been        filed       on        behalf          of      the

respondents,             to     the       writ       petition,           raising          certain

preliminary objections, to the effect, that the petitioner has based his case on alleged malafide intention against various officials of the corporation, who have not been impleaded as party respondent, in absence of whom, the averments cannot be examined. Then giving para wise reply, it was contended inter alia, that the order dated 01.1.1990 was merely offer of appointment. It was admitted that the petitioner was fixed in the pay scale of Rs. 4500-5700, which appointment was accepted, and the petitioner joined the service, while he should not have accepted the appointment, if the pay scale was not acceptable to him. It is alleged, that the representation regarding fixation was duly replied, being AnnexureR/1 dated 16.1.1992. The claim of the petitioner, being senior most was denied, contending that on joining of the new post, the petitioner cannot claim to be senior most doctor, on the very first day, and that since Dr. P.K. Sinha was already working as medical superintendent, there was no question of making the petitioner as Medical Superintendent, immediately on his joining, as he was having no experience of administration, or knowledge, about the work in the new hospital.