Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

11. Coming to the question of sentence, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner contended that the trial court sentenced the accused and imposed compensation exceeding the amount covered under the cheque. According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the original complainant in this case is the District Officer, Matsyafed, Thrissur, a public sector company owned by the State. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner further submitted that it is unfair on the part of the original complainant to extract excess amount as compensation from the accused who finds difficult to earn a livelihood. Further, he is a handicapped person with ..11..