Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. In the written version filed on behalf of respondent no.2, it was pleaded that the complaint is not maintainable against respondent no.2. It was pleaded that respondent no.2 is merely an entity of Mata Savitri Devi Memorial Welfare Society and the appellant is a founder member of the society, who established GRD College of Technical Education, Sangrur under the resolution of is society. As per pleadings, respondent no.1 got admission in September, 2004 in GRD College and she has given two applications. Respondent no.1 has not come to the District Forum with clean hands. Respondent No.2 College is providing only the distance education, being affiliated with IASE University, Rajasthan. Other allegations were denied and in the preliminary objections, it was pleaded that respondent no.1 is trying to mislead the District Forum and she has concealed true facts and she cannot be allowed to take advantage of her own wrongs. It was prayed that the complaint may be dismissed.