Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Firstly, it is the width of the power under the impugned amendments introducing and amending Articles 16(4-A) and 16(4-B) that has to be tested. Therefore the "width test" has to be applied. The boundaries of the "width" of the power, namely, (1) the ceiling limit of 50% (quantitative limitation), (2) the principle of creamy layer (qualitative exclusion), (3) the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation, and (4) the overall administrative efficiency are not obliterated by the impugned amendments. The constitution limitation under Article 335 is relaxed and not obliterated. These impugned amendments are confined only to SCs and STs and the sub-classification between OBCs on one hand and SCs and STs on the other hand as held in Indra Sawhney, 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217, and the concept of post-based roster with inbuilt concept of replacement as held in R.K. Sabharwal, (1995) 2 SCC 745, have also not been obliterated. (emphasis added) Secondly, applying the test of "identity" there is no alteration in the existing structure of the equality code (Articles 14, 15 and 16) in the Constitution by the impugned amendments. Equity, justice and efficiency are the limitations on the mode of the exercise of power by the State. None of these limitations have been removed by the impugned amendments. None of the axioms like secularism, federalism, etc. which are underlying principles have been violated by the impugned constitution amendments. There is no violation of the basic structure of the Constitution by any of the impugned amendments. The impugned constitutional amendments by which Articles 16(4-A) and 16(4-B) have been inserted flow from Article 16(4). They do not alter the structure of Article 16(4). Articles 16(4-