Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: zoom developers in P.A.Sainuddin vs The Executive EngineerMatching Fragments
7. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent Board is fallacious. It is pointed out that the petitioners ..7..
specifically requested the Board to invoke Section 85(6) of the Kerala State Housing Board Act (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act") though the impugned order is not strictly one coming within the purview of the Act. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the impugned order does not make provision for any rational and logical explanation to reject the representation. It was also pointed out that the reasons are not supported by the materials on record. In this connection, the learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to the decision of the apex court in Noida Entrepreneurs Association v. Noida & Others [2007 (10) SCC 385], which was followed in State of Kerala v. Zoom Developers Ltd. & Others [2009 (4) SCC 563].