Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. Counter affidavit has been filed stating that the marks shown in the reply under the Right to Information Act are not correct and the actual score is 43.58969.

4. This Court had directed the respondents to place on record the manner in which the normalisation of the mark was done and the formula which was adopted and the actual numerical figures representing each item of the formula. Thereafter, the details have been provided. This Court is not an expert regarding the statistical formula which was placed on record. However, it is evident from the numerical figures representing each of the item in the formula that there is substance in what is stated by the respondents regarding the mark which has been given. This Court cannot proceed WP(C) NO. 9165 OF 2025 2025:KER:72639 merely on the basis of the information received under the Right to Information Act and the records which are made available would show that there is an error in the information supplied to the petitioner under the Right to Information Act. This Court hence does not find any reason to re-open the issue which has been settled by the earlier judgment. The writ petition fails and is dismissed.