Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: NET compulsory in Ramendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 30 July, 2025Matching Fragments
18. The Hon'ble Court observed in paragraph 16 that Apex Court placed reliance on a earlier judgment in Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar vs Raj Kumari & another in 1970 3 SCC 129, wherein it was held that 25% of the husband's net salary could be just and proper to be awarded as maintenance to the respondent wife.
19. In application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. dated 30.05.2023 the revisionist has alleged that applicant has concealed her four bank accounts whose details are given in paragraph No.4 of the application and has stated that Bank account of HDFC is her salary account, in which salary Rs.17,200/- is credited therein on monthly basis. In the rejoinder affidavit dated 02.12.2024 the revisionist has stated that during the course of time, salary has increased and now his net salary is Rs.47,016/-, but has stated even then the amount of maintenance awarded against the revisionist is exorbitant. The revisionist has filed her salary chart for the year 2018-2023, which reveals that in April 2023 his gross salary was Rs.64121/- and net salary was Rs.47016/- after compulsory deductions.