Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

- the CPC) that defendants are residents of USA. They inquired from their nephew Raghbir Singh and came to know that alleged agreement to sell stated to have been attested by one Harbhajan Singh, Lamberdar and Balbir Singh was the second witness, residents of village Chawinda Devi and Parma Nand was the deed writer. The said deed writer appeared as PW-1 and has stated that he was not maintaining any register but actually he was maintaining a register. The defendants now respondents have procured the said register, after the death of said deed writer. They moved an application in the trial Court to prove that Parma Nand was telling lie inasmuch as he was maintaining a register. Further, the respondents have procured documents regarding Lamberdari of village Chawinda Devi through RTI from the office of Collector for the year 1948-49 to 1955-1956 and till date. In which, it has been mentioned that there is no Lamberdar with the name of Harbhajan Singh appointed in village Chawinda Devi. Further, it is alleged that Balbir Singh son of Joginder Singh, who is stated to be an attesting witness of the agreement never appeared before the trial Court. In fact, some other Balbir Singh of village Rupowali Chogwan appeared as a witness and made deposition as Balbir Singh son of Joginder Singh, the age of said Balbir Singh was 50 years whereas actual age of Balbir Singh son of Joginder Singh resident of village Chawinda Devi is 75 years. So, the plaintiffs have tried to impersonate another person as Balbir Singh son of Joginder Singh. It is further pleaded that since they were residing in USA and as such they could not gather information about the said fact. It is further pleaded that 4-5 days prior to the alleged agreement, Chaman Singh executed mortgage deed on which he signed as mortgagor whereas the agreement contains the thumb impression of Chaman Singh, which casts a serious doubt about the execution of the document. The said document is the result of fraud.