Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of Rs. 9,36,017/-

along with interest as prayed in the plaint ? OPP.

5. Relief."

7. To prove its case, plaintiff examined Sh. Ashok Kumar Parwanda as PW1 who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex. PW1/A. M/s. Technip Books International Vs. Institute of Technology and Management & Anr. Page 4 He further proved documents Ex. PW1/1 to Ex. PW1/32. Exhibition of these documents were objected on the ground that the documents were photocopies. The plaintiff further proved Ex. PW1/33, photocopy of receipt Ex. PW1/34 and reply of notice by defendant no. 1 as Ex. PW1/35. This witness was cross-examined by ld counsel for the defendant and thereafter by separate statement, plaintiff closed PE. In defence, defendant had examined Sh. Pawan Sharma and tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex. PW1/A. This witness was cross-examined by ld counsel for the plaintiff and thereafter by separate statement, ld counsel for the defendant closed DE. However, an application under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC was moved and the said application was allowed by this court by order dated 14/01/2013 and in view of the said order, DW1 was further cross-examined by ld counsel for the plaintiff.