Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

According to the applicants, the reservation figures ought to have been the following

1. Notified Enhanced Increased no % / Vacancies Vacancies of Vacancies increase / Yr 2012 4179 5847 1668 39.91% [ii]. As per Section 33 of the Act, minimum 3% of vacancies ought to be reserved for, PWD candidates, which turns out of the following:

"PWD candidates out of 5847 PWD candidates out of 4179 (enhanced no. of vacancies) (original no. as notified in E.N.No.01 12) Rounded off Rounded off Table A Table-B As per calculation in table (A) PWD vacancies for Yr 2012 should have increased from 32 (13+7+12) to 175.41 i.e. 3% of 5847. That means another 143.41 (175.41-32) vacancies should have been added.
As per calculation in table (B) PWD vacancies for Yr 2012 should have increased from 32 (13+7+12) to 125.37 i.e. 3% of 4179. That means another 93.37 (125.37-32) vacancies should have been added in the E.N.No.01 12 dt. 16.08.2012.
In both the cases we should not include the carried over vacancies of 198 (VH - 97+HH-
101) for the Yr 2010 as section 36 clearly states that Any recruitment year (herein Yr. 2010) any vacancy u/s 33 cannot be filled up due to non-availability of a suitable person with disability or for any other sufficient reason, such vacancy should be carried forward in the succeeding recruitment yr (i.e. Yr2012) and if in the succeeding yr (i.e. Yr 2012) also suitable person with disability is not available, it may first be filled by interchange among the 3 categories i.e. OH, VH &HHand Only when there is no person with disability available for the post in that Yr (herein Yr 2012), the employer shall fill up the vacancy by appointment of a person, other than a person with disability.