Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments



                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/11657/2025                                 ORDER DATED: 20/06/2025

                                                                                                              undefined

4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the investigation in the present offence is still in progress. The Applicant herein had allegedly transferred an amount of Rs.24,85,000/- through angadia pedhi of the first informant and the said amount had been collected by the other co-accused. However, the Applicant had not deposited the said amount of Rs.24,85,000/- with the said angadia pedhi. Learned APP has therefore submitted that looking to the nature of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the Application may be dismissed.

5. Heard learned Advocates for the parties and perused the record. As per the case of the prosecution, the role attributed to the Applicant is to the effect that the Applicant herein had defrauded the angadia pedhi of the first informant to the tune of Rs.24,85,000/- by not depositing the said amount with the angadia pedhi. Having regard to the nature of offence and the allegations levelled against the present Applicant, the Application deserves consideration. This court has also considered the following aspects: