Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 2G SCAM CASE in Prem Bhutani & Anr vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 30 November, 2023Matching Fragments
xxx xxx
25. Admittedly, the co-accused of 2G Scam case charged under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act can be tried only by the Special Judge. The petitioners are co-accused in the said 2G Scam case. In this background Section 220 CrPC will apply and the petitioners though accused of different offences i.e. under Sections 420/120-B IPC, which alleged to have been committed in the course of 2G Spectrum transactions, under Section 223 CrPC they may be charged and can be tried together with the other co-accused of 2G Scam cases.
29. Admittedly, 2G Scam case is triable by the Special Judge against the persons accused of offences punishable under the PC Act in view of sub-section (1) of Section 4. The Special Judge alone can take the cognizance of the offence specified in sub-section (1) of Section 3 and conspiracy in relation to them. While trying any case, the Special Judge may also try an offence other than the offence specified in sub- section (1) of Section 3, in view of sub-section (3) of Section 4. A Magistrate cannot take cognizance of offence as specified in Section 3(1) of the PC Act. In this background, as the petitioners have been shown as co-accused in second supplementary charge-sheet filed in 2G Scam case, it is open to the Special Judge to take cognizance of the offence under Section 120-B and Section 420 IPC."