Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the informant- drug inspector seized drug from Community Health Center, Barharwa which was found to have been manufactured by M/s Win Care Pharmaceutical, Sandalpur, Panji Goa though M/s Win Care Pharmaceutical has no licence for manufacturing the drug, rather the M/s Win Care Pharmaceutical has only licence as a wholeseller of the said drug. It is further submitted that M/s Abhishek Enterprises has purchased the said drug from Mahalakshmi Pharmaceuticals but on investigation it was found that M/s Mahalakshmi Pharmaceuticals is a nonexistent entity. It is next submitted that the petitioner is a dealer/ supplier of the medicine and has proper drug licence issued by the competent authority though it is mentioned in paragraph no.12 of the petition that the petitioner has purchased the said alleged spurious medicine namely Cipowin from M/s Win Care Pharmaceutical, Sandalpur, Patna but the petitioner has no documents to show such purchase rather the document shows that the purchase was made by the petitioner from the nonexistent firm namely M/s Mahalakshmi Pharmaceuticals. It is also submitted that the medicines were supplied to the petitioner through or in the name of Mahalakshmi Pharmaceuticals and though one M/s Win Care Pharmaceutical is existing in Patna but it has no licence to manufacture medicines rather it procures the medicines from M/s Kras Pharmaceutical Private Limited and to this effect a certificate has been issued by M/s Kras Pharmaceutical Private Limited. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.