Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
During the course of investigation, the police examined PW.6, by name, Shaik Mohammad Rafi, who is said to have informed that on 06.01.2008, he was returning from Patibandla Tiranala, and when he reached Podapadu Bus stop, he noticed A1, the deceased, Adam Shafi, and four others, and on enquiry, they informed that they were discussing about family matters.
PW.7, by name, Shaik Irfan, is said to have noticed A1 to A5, near a Brandi shop, and that he over heard them, when they were discussing plans to liquidate the deceased. A1 is said to have cautioned him, not to reveal the information, to anyone.
Assuming that the needle of suspicion points to A1, it is just un-understandable as to how A2 to A6 were put to trial. The basis for framing charge against A2 to A6 is said to be the information furnished by PWs.5 and 6. While the former said that he has seen A1, the deceased, and four others, at bus stand, and the latter said that he has seen A1 to A5, near a brandy shop. PW.5 did not even mention that he was acquainted with A2 to A6. At any rate, he accounted for four persons, over and above, A1. PW.6 stated that he identified A1 to A5, when he saw them near brandy shop. No one has mentioned the name of A6.