Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S.Himavarsha Kuries Private ... vs Maggi M.T on 31 July, 2025

                                                                   2025:KER:57677

Company Claim No.226 of 2021
     in
C.P.No.13 of 2014                       :1:



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                (Original Jurisdiction)

                                       Present:
                       The Honourable Mr.Justice VIJU ABRAHAM
                  Thursday, the 31st day of July, 2025/9th Sravana, 1947

                      In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956
                                          and
       In the matter of M/s.Himavarsha Kuries Private Limited (In Liquidation)

                         CC No.226/2021 in Co. Pet. No.13/2014



Claimant:-

       M/s.Himavarsha Kuries Private Limited (In Liquidation),
       Represented by the Official Liquidator, High Court of Kerala,
       Ernakulam.


Respondent:-

       Maggi M.T.,
       Marottikkal House,
       Old Panchayath Road,
       Puthur,
       Thrissur - 680 014.


       This Claim coming on for hearing on this day in the presence of
Smt.S.Jasmine, Standing Counsel for the Official Liquidator, this Court delivered
the following:-
                                                        2025:KER:57677

Company Claim No.226 of 2021
     in
C.P.No.13 of 2014               :2:



                          VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
         --    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                   Company Claim No.226 of 2021
                                   in
                          C.P.No.13 of 2014
         --    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                  Dated this the 31st day of July, 2025

                               JUDGMENT

Despite several opportunities granted, no steps have been taken for service of notice on the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner's claim is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/