Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole rules in Sartajkhan Mumtazkhan Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 April, 2021Matching Fragments
4] Heard the learned APP appearing for the State. 5] Perused the impugned order. It appears that the Petitioner is convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 364-A and Section 365 of the IPC.
6] The learned APP for the State submitted that in view of Rule 4(13) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, (For short "the said Rules") Petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought. 7] Rule 4(13) of the said Rules reads thus :-
"(4) Eligibility for furlough.-