Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

5. Our attention was also invited to a communication dt. 16.05.2016. It was submitted by Mr Bora that the software IPR with Source Code on Pen-drive was handed over to the official of the University namely the Director of B.C.U.D. It was further the submission of Mr Bora that, in view of the meeting of the Management Council, the decision of the Purchase Committee and communication dt. 16.05.2016, it was the reasonable expectation of 5 Sr20WP1413.2017 the petitioner that the respondent-University would place a purchase order with the petitioner and accordingly the petitioner would be entitled for his monetary benefits under the purchase order. But, to the surprise of the petitioner, the respondent - University, by communication dt. 18.05.2016, informed the petitioner that the subject purchase order is kept in abeyance till further orders.