Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: revised return when valid in Rachna Gupta,New Delhi vs Acit, Central Circle-29, New Delhi on 20 December, 2024Matching Fragments
"1. That on facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO.
2. That on facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in confirming the order passed u/s 143(3) by the Ld. AO despite the fact that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued subsequent to the filing of valid revised return.
3. That on facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT (A) erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.29,71,941/- under section 68 of the Act treating the gain accrued on the shares of Channel Nine as bogus.
18.That the Appellant, being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], has preferred the present appeal before this Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
A. In Re Ground no. 1 & 2:
7 ITA No.5418/DEL/2018 ITA No.2531/Del/2022That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld. AO by confirming the order passed under section 143(3), despite the fact that no notice under section 143(2) was issued subsequent to the filing of a valid revised return.