Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: hash value in Chandrakant Jankiram Deshmukh And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 22 January, 2026Matching Fragments
7. The learned counsel for the petitioners still argued that considering the principles of fair trial as reflected in the judgment in Sovaran Singh Prajapati (supra), the Investigating Officer can be permitted to obtain those hard discs from the petitioners for its inclusion in the prosecution evidence. However, it is pertinent to note that there is no prayer in the petition to that effect and even if it is there, then such direction could not have been given mainly because there may be possibility of tampering of the original hard discs by the petitioners/accused to establish their innocence, Cri.WP-1749.2025.odt by playing fraud. Apart from that, even if such direction is given, the purpose of fair trial cannot be achieved since for the prosecution there was no opportunity of having original hash value of the recording in respect of data of 16.05.2025 considering the possibility of tampering the original hard discs which are already in possession of the petitioners/accused. The petitioners may establish their innocence by examining appropriate persons during the trial as their defence witnesses. It is made clear that these observations will not come in the way of petitioners to make an application as is permissible in law to that effect.