Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials on record. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in appellant's own case cited supra had held that the payment made to NRI for the purchase of software is liable for tax deduction under section 195 of the Act. The relevant finding of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court from para 20 to 25 reads as follows:-

"20. Having regard to the above said definition of 'royalty', we have to consider the contents of software licence agreement entered into by non-resident with Samsung Electronics and also respondents in the case represented by Shri Ganesh, learned Senior Counsel and Sri Aravind Dattar, wherein it is a case of purchase, sale or distribution or otherwise of the off-the-shelf software. It is described as a 'software licence agreement', wherein it is averred that customer accepts an individual, non- transferable and non exclusive licence to use the licensed software program(s) (program(s) on the terms and conditions enumerated in the agreement. It is further averred that the customer - Samsung Electronics shall protect confidential information and shall not remove any copyright, confidentiality or other proprietary rights provided by the non-resident. However, what is granted under the said licence is only a licence to use the software for internal business without having any right for making any alteration or reverse engineering or creating sub-licences. What is transferred under the said licence is the licence to use the software and copyright continue to be with the non-resident as per the agreement. Even as per the agreement entered into with the other distributors as also the end user licence agreement, it is clear that the distributor would get exclusive non transferable licence within the territory for which he is appointed and he has got right to distribute via resellers the Software, upon payment of the licenses set forth in Exhibit A to the agreement only to end users pursuant to a valid Actuate shrinkwrap or other Actuate license agreement and except as expressly set forth in the said agreement, distributor may not rent, lease, loan, sell or otherwise distribute the software the Documentation or any derivative works based upon the Software or Documentation in whole or in part. Distributor shall not reverse engineer, decompile or otherwise attempt to derive or modify the source code for the software. Distributor shall have no rights to the software other than the rights expressly set forth in the agreement. Distributor shall not modify or copy any part of the Software or Documentation. Distributor may not use subdistributors for further distribution of the software and documentation without the prior consent of Actuate. What is charged is the licence fee to be paid by the Distributor of the software as enumerated in Exhibit A to the agreement. Further, Clause 6.01 of the agreement dealing with title states that the distributor acknowledges that Actuate and its suppliers retain all right, title and interest in and to the original, and any copies (by whomever produced), of the Software or Documentation and ownership of all patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property rights pertaining thereto, shall be and remain the sole property of Actuate. Distributor shall not be an owner of any copies of, or any interest in, the Software, but rather, is licenced pursuant to the Agreement to use and distribute such copies. Actuate represents that it has the right to enter into the Agreement and grant the licences provided therein and confidentiality is protected. Therefore, on reading the contents of the respective agreement entered into by the respondent& with the Ron-resident, it is clear that under the agreement, what is transferred is only a licence to use the copyright belonging to the non-resident subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement as referred to above and the non-resident supplier continues to be the owner of the copyright and all other intellectual property rights. It is well settled that copyright Is a negative right. It Is an umbrella of many rights and licence is granted for making use of the copyright in respect of shrink wrapped software I off-the- shelf software under the respective agreement, which authorizes the end user i.e., the customer to make use of the copyright software contained in the said software, which is purchased off the shelf or Imported as shrink wrapped software and the same would amount to transfer of part of the copyright and transfer of right to use the copyright for internal business as per the terms and conditions of the agreement. Therefore, the contention of the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent& that there is no transfer of copyright or any part thereof under the agreements entered into by the respondent with the nonresident supplier of software cannot be accepted.