Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12. In the memorandum of appeal it has been stated by the appellant specifically that the Central Government had appointed a Commission under the Chairmanship of Justice M.B. Shah (Retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India) under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 vide notification dated 22nd November, 2010 to examine illegal and unjustified mining activities going on in the States of Orissa, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, as a number of complaints in that regard had been received by the Central Government. Though, the State of Goa had not complained about the mining activities but in the investigation carried out by Justice Shah Commission and in the report submitted by it on 15th March, 2012 irregularity and unscrupulous operations with respect to the mining activities in the State of Goa, that was also tabled before the Parliament on 7th September, 2012 along with the Action Taken Report of the Ministry of Mines, Government of India. The said report has neither been debated nor been accepted by the Parliament as of now. Against the report of Justice M.B. Shah Commission, the issue raised by the appellant is that they were never granted any hearing in terms of Sections 8(b) and 8(c) of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1962 and as such the same was non est in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Bihar v. L.K. Advani and Ors. (2003) 8 SCC 361. Once the report prepared by Justice M.B. Shah Commission was tabled before the Parliament, the State of Goa vide its order dated 10 th September, 2012 suspended all the mining operations with effect from 11th September, 2012. The District Magistrate of North Goa and South Goa also issued orders in relation to prohibiting the movement and transportation of iron ore vide their order dated 11 th and 12th September, 2012 respectively. These orders have been challenged by the appellant and the appeal is pending before the High Court.